Skip to comments.
Lawmakers pass smoking ban with fine print
Florida Times Union ^
| 05/29/03
| Rich Tucker
Posted on 05/29/2003 8:12:47 AM PDT by m1-lightning
Edited on 04/21/2004 9:00:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
TALLAHASSEE -- The smoking ban lawmakers passed late Tuesday will implement the constitutional amendment voters overwhelmingly approved in November, but there is some fine print.
Beginning July 1 the prohibition bill, now awaiting the governor's signature, will exempt stand-alone bars that serve some snacks but do not earn more than 10 percent of their revenue from food sales.
(Excerpt) Read more at jacksonville.com ...
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: jebbush; pufflist; smokingban; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Smoking bans are becoming contagious. We, in Illinois, will probably be next.
To: m1-lightning
The city council here in Austin, Texas, passed a draconian anti-smoking ordinance last month. I don't smoke, but I think it is a private property issue and the government shouldn't be involved.
2
posted on
05/29/2003 8:17:21 AM PDT
by
Andiceman
To: Andiceman
I don't smoke, but I think it is a private property issue and the government shouldn't be involved. No doubt. When this hype started about banning smoking first began, I thought it to protect the public from second hand smoke indoors. But now that I see cities banning it outdoors as well, I can plainly see it is a source of revenue rather than a liberty issue.
3
posted on
05/29/2003 8:21:32 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's fortunate millionaires are the ones that sue manufacturers for a living.)
To: m1-lightning
I am all for these smoking bans in bars. If we can get alcohol consumption and pool shooting outlawed from bars, they will be a much better place for me to take my toddlers.
To: m1-lightning
FL is one of our fave places to take the Motorhome, since it has nice beaches and is only a day's drive from Nashville (although I like to split it up). It's a darned good thing that many restaurants have outdoor sections, because if they didn't - or banned smoking outdoors, I'd be parking the rig and spending my money in some other beach state. I don't like supporting states that remove freedoms from business owners and their clientele.
Michael
To: m1-lightning
I just wonder when the country is going to wake up and understand just what these smoking bans actually are. And especially since all the real evidence indicates that the danger from "second-hand smoke" is a fallacy, save for places like airplanes and other closed areas. Will we ever see these bans repealed? (Don't hold your breath.)
6
posted on
05/29/2003 8:37:38 AM PDT
by
szweig
To: Wright is right!
Acording to the article, if a bar were to lower it's food revenue below 10% then smoking would be allowed. I'm curious if the legislature would allow walls being built between the food section and the bar section. If that's the case, then you might see a string of new style bars.
7
posted on
05/29/2003 8:43:54 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's fortunate millionaires are the ones that sue manufacturers for a living.)
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
8
posted on
05/29/2003 8:49:16 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(After two years of FReeping, I've finally created a profile page. Check it out!)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Onelifetogive
Don't forget the loud music playing, poor dears will be deaf in no time.
10
posted on
05/29/2003 8:55:34 AM PDT
by
cabbieguy
(eye suport publik edukashun)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: m1-lightning; *Wod_list
The War On Some Drugs is extended to another recreational substance. All hail the Nanny State!
12
posted on
05/29/2003 8:58:01 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: Joe Whitey
The ban is expected to be largely self-enforced, with citizens reporting violations. That's where the revenue steps in.
You can't expect a citizen to report a mugging or gang brutality but you can bet their will be many non-smoking whinos up in arms.
13
posted on
05/29/2003 8:59:53 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's fortunate millionaires are the ones that sue manufacturers for a living.)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: MrLeRoy
The War On Some Drugs is extended to another recreational substance.By 2010, it will be extended to fast food, sugar and caffeine. There's nothing worse than a bunch of punk Democrats and Rinos telling us how to live our lives.
15
posted on
05/29/2003 9:07:50 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's fortunate millionaires are the ones that sue manufacturers for a living.)
To: Joe Whitey
It will be mom & pop places and small out of the way bars. That's sad too. It's bad enough that cities like mine give subsidies to big restaurant chains. But to turn around and destroy the local businesses with idiotic revenue vacuum legislature really draws the line.
16
posted on
05/29/2003 9:13:50 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's fortunate millionaires are the ones that sue manufacturers for a living.)
To: m1-lightning
Smoking bans are becoming contagious. We, in Illinois, will probably be next.The frog is cooking.
Now let's see how long before some "conservatives" show up on this thread to defend the fascists.
17
posted on
05/29/2003 9:15:16 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: m1-lightning
Certain airport customs areas and tobacco manufacturers also are exempted from the ban.What's that about? Allowing foreigners to smoke while going thru customs?
FMCDH
18
posted on
05/29/2003 9:15:55 AM PDT
by
nothingnew
(the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
To: m1-lightning
why is it they are banning smoking while they keep increasing the cigarete taxes?
19
posted on
05/29/2003 9:51:47 AM PDT
by
rebeliam
To: Joe Whitey
Why couldn't you just put a wall down the middle of your bar, get another business entity and call one side 'Joe's Restaurant' and the other side 'Joe's Bar'?
If you really want to thumb your nose, make 'Joe's Restaurant' BYOB.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson